Divided Feedbacks

Have any ideas to improve the forum? Post them here!
User avatar
Alireza
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:17 am
Contact:

Divided Feedbacks

Post by Alireza »

Hi,
I think we should divide the feedback's section to two groups : a)successes b)failures
What do you think about this idea?
Autographs Received: William Mapother (2x), Donald Braswell II (3x), Paulo Coelho (2x), Jackie Collins (2x), John Travolta, Ozzy Osbourne, Andrea Bocelli, François Chau, Josh Groban (2x), Jackie Chan, John Glenn, Michael Crawford (2x)
Waiting To Receive: Evangeline Lilly, Robert Duvall, Anousheh Ansari, Rafael Nadal, Katie Melua, José Carreras
User avatar
Icena
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by Icena »

Not a bad idea, but it might be a bit hard to classify successes/failures. What if someone receives a PP back? Is that a success or a failure? It's different for different people.
Image
R.I.P Jeremy Brett, The Only Sherlock Holmes I've Ever Known.
Jaffer
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 6069
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by Jaffer »

Perhaps authentic/ non authentic?
Best successes: Gal Gadot, Jennifer Lawrence, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Rachel McAdams

Best Responses: Freida Pinto, Gemma Arterton, Berenice Marlohe, Jeremy Renner

Recent successes: Connie Nielsen, Ursula Corbero, Daniela Melchior, Kate Beckinsale, Amber Heard
User avatar
Icena
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 710
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:26 pm
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by Icena »

Jaffer wrote:Perhaps authentic/ non authentic?
Hmm, that's a pretty good idea!
Image
R.I.P Jeremy Brett, The Only Sherlock Holmes I've Ever Known.
User avatar
osiris
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1347
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:01 am
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by osiris »

Icena wrote:
Jaffer wrote:Perhaps authentic/ non authentic?
Hmm, that's a pretty good idea!
The problem with that is that then you have to have someone saying what is and isnt authentic. Arguments are going to ensue regarding sec/non sec, people who think it's authentic and they have a PP or an AP etc. Someone is going to have to move all these to the right section... it's a huge undertaking.
Image Image Image Image Image Image
Favourite: David Tennant IP, John Barrowman IP, Patrick Stewart IP, Catherine Tate VV.
Newest: John Simm IP, Suranne Jones IP, Jonathan Groff IP.
User avatar
khackdrums
Posts: 1084
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by khackdrums »

This would create the inevitable problem of unnecessary arguments, something this forum already has too much of.
Kyle :)

Image

DON'T TREAD ON ME! [us] PRIDE!

Grunge is Dead.
User avatar
rayzer369
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:45 am
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by rayzer369 »

unless someone puts in the time and effort to show proof of a success ie , photo, i don't think it should be listed under successes-when it comes down to it a lot of the successes around here could go uncounted -jmo
User avatar
packrat
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Divided Feedbacks

Post by packrat »

As far as I've been able to discern, the feedback forum is not about successes and failures, nor is it about whether the autograph is genuine or not. It's about the addresses in the database. The folks running the site are asking for feedback on whether the address listed for each celebrity is accurate and/or current. Whether you get a success or a failure is a whole 'nother topic.
Image


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests