Doris Day Success

[MW1221]

Slander doesn't fall under freedom of speech. And my question to you stands. If you don't care about the site, then why demand that someone post proof from that site?

SLANDER? hahahahaha!! Anyways, I care about the TRUTH of Doris Day "successes", but as long as they address it TO HIM I can't argue with that..( until I send mine into them that is) ;)

And you continue to ignore the question.

[bseddie]

Sorry guys but the photo that she sent to me was not signed by her. After researching her real autograph it is nothing like it. So it is probably a sec, I am tempted to send it back with a Different LOR telling them how disappointed I am with her. Say Ya of Na. You guys help me decide!!!!

[classicmovies]

Sorry guys but the photo that she sent to me was not signed by her. After researching her real autograph it is nothing like it. So it is probably a sec, I am tempted to send it back with a Different LOR telling them how disappointed I am with her. Say Ya of Na. You guys help me decide!!!!

No no no. No matter how disappointed you are at the response, sending a letter saying that to someone who recently turned 88 is inappropriate...

[classicmovies]

I also would like to add, while I don't know if she signs them or not, please don't believe story's the national enquirer magazine's make up about her no longer going by Doris Day or whatever stories they made up. In fact she is fan friendly, she has posed with Flowers on her website a fan has sent to her before, and has said she enjoys reading her fan mail. She was recently Star of the month on Turner Classic Movies even narrating her career and memories in a commercial for the network, at the end you can see a computer pen signing her name and it matches her TTM signatures. Recently she also put together her favorite songs she recorded on a CD available for purchase on the Turner Classic Movies website or your local Barnes and Noble. So yeah, don't believe made up magazine tabloid lies.

Here's the link to her Star of The Month video on TCM! :

http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/4823 ... -2012.html

[KennyDolly]

Why can't we be friends, why can't we be friends?

[dancingirl1]

Slander doesn't fall under freedom of speech. And my question to you stands. If you don't care about the site, then why demand that someone post proof from that site?

SLANDER? hahahahaha!! Anyways, I care about the TRUTH of Doris Day "successes", but as long as they address it TO HIM I can't argue with that..( until I send mine into them that is) ;)

And you continue to ignore the question.

No the answer is there, but no my fault if you can't see it.

[dancingirl1]

Sorry guys but the photo that she sent to me was not signed by her. After researching her real autograph it is nothing like it. So it is probably a sec, I am tempted to send it back with a Different LOR telling them how disappointed I am with her. Say Ya of Na. You guys help me decide!!!!

I know it's a SEC, (like I have BEEN saying..) ;) however don't do that.

[MW1221]

SLANDER? hahahahaha!! Anyways, I care about the TRUTH of Doris Day "successes", but as long as they address it TO HIM I can't argue with that..( until I send mine into them that is) ;)

And you continue to ignore the question.

No the answer is there, but no my fault if you can't see it.

In what way does any of that answer my question? You said that if the poster supplied proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day successes, you'd apologize to the OP. I supplied you with proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day autographs and you suddenly no longer care about what PSA says. So, my question to you is why did you ask for proof in the first place if you're just going to argue with its validity anyway? Nothing you wrote there addresses that question.

[dancingirl1]

In what way does any of that answer my question? You said that if the poster supplied proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day successes, you'd apologize to the OP. I supplied you with proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day autographs and you suddenly no longer care about what PSA says. So, my question to you is why did you ask for proof in the first place if you're just going to argue with its validity anyway? Nothing you wrote there addresses that question.

"...Anyways, I care about the TRUTH of Doris Day "successes", but as long as they address it TO HIM I can't argue with that..( until I send mine into them that is)..........."

This means once the OP gets back his COA from the PSA place and it says "AUTHENTIC" I will apologize to the OP "(until I send mine into them that is)" ;)

[MW1221]

In what way does any of that answer my question? You said that if the poster supplied proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day successes, you'd apologize to the OP. I supplied you with proof that PSA authenticated one of those Doris Day autographs and you suddenly no longer care about what PSA says. So, my question to you is why did you ask for proof in the first place if you're just going to argue with its validity anyway? Nothing you wrote there addresses that question.

"...Anyways, I care about the TRUTH of Doris Day "successes", but as long as they address it TO HIM I can't argue with that..( until I send mine into them that is)..........."

This means once the OP gets back his COA from the PSA place and it says "AUTHENTIC" I will apologize to the OP "(until I send mine into them that is)" ;)

That wasn't what you asked for originally. You asked for this user's proof.

I sent my to PSA/DNA and they said it was 100% REAL!

TAKE a photo of your "proof" and prove yourself. This will discard ALL the debaye about her autograph. Show me proof please And if you're telling the truth, I will apologize to the OP. So I will wait for your proof ;)

I sent proof that's just as valid. Yet you're not holding your end of that bargain.