yanksfan wrote:When you said all the post did was attack, you had no evidence to back up that it even was attack. All he did was try to come to an agreement, it was over, then low-and-behold, you come and start it right back up again because you need to ensure your ego is bigger than Obama's debt.
Look up the definition of "ad hominem".
I shouldn't have to write an explanation of how a post that says nothing except an insult against another person is anything other than an attack that doesn't contribute to the conversation at hand, because of common sense.
You know, like this:
you come and start it right back up again because you need to ensure your ego is bigger than Obama's debt.
1) You're bringing politics into a discussion that isn't about politics, which will inflame some people.
2) Provide evidence that Obama alone is responsible for the debt.
3) You're flat out insulting me.
4) Please show me a psychiatric analysis of my ego that backs up your assertion.
5) Please show me evidence that proves your assertion for the reasons for my actions.
Ok, now you can explain how that line was constructive and substantiated by evidence and actually serves a purpose other than attacking me personally, as well as taking a dig at the current US President, who, up until now, was not once brought up in this discussion.
[quote="yanksfan"]When you said all the post did was attack, you had no evidence to back up that it even was attack. All he did was try to come to an agreement, it was over, then low-and-behold, you come and start it right back up again because you need to ensure your ego is bigger than Obama's debt.[/quote]
Look up the definition of "ad hominem".
I shouldn't have to write an explanation of how a post that says nothing except an insult against another person is anything other than an attack that doesn't contribute to the conversation at hand, because of common sense.
You know, like this:
[quote]you come and start it right back up again because you need to ensure your ego is bigger than Obama's debt.[/quote]
1) You're bringing politics into a discussion that isn't about politics, which will inflame some people.
2) Provide evidence that Obama alone is responsible for the debt.
3) You're flat out insulting me.
4) Please show me a psychiatric analysis of my ego that backs up your assertion.
5) Please show me evidence that proves your assertion for the reasons for my actions.
Ok, now you can explain how that line was constructive and substantiated by evidence and actually serves a purpose other than attacking me personally, as well as taking a dig at the current US President, who, up until now, was not once brought up in this discussion.