by Adam83 » Sat Jul 30, 2022 3:05 pm
Although she does not use social media, I had an online conversation last year with someone I initially believed to be Kath Soucie, but turned out to be a scam artist when they asked me to buy them a very specific gift card. They also did not get her date of birth correct quizzing them on it, which, for the record, is actually
November 18, 1953, NOT
February 20, 1967 like most of the Internet thinks it is, especially with what I've seen her in prior to becoming a voice actress.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1576640 ... 386017473/
I've even had contact with two of her colleagues about it on Facebook. One of them, EG Daily, (whose birthday is September 11, 1961), tells me that 02/20/67 is incorrect and that Ms. Soucie is definitely older than she is. The other, Greg Berg, tells me that there is a lot of misinformation that goes around in the entertainment industry about certain actors' ages and bios, and it's not even from the actors themselves.
Although she does not use social media, I had an online conversation last year with someone I initially believed to be Kath Soucie, but turned out to be a scam artist when they asked me to buy them a very specific gift card. They also did not get her date of birth correct quizzing them on it, which, for the record, is actually [b]November 18, 1953[/b], NOT [b]February 20, 1967[/b] like most of the Internet thinks it is, especially with what I've seen her in prior to becoming a voice actress.
[url]https://www.facebook.com/groups/1576640435946418/permalink/3242596386017473/[/url]
I've even had contact with two of her colleagues about it on Facebook. One of them, EG Daily, (whose birthday is September 11, 1961), tells me that 02/20/67 is incorrect and that Ms. Soucie is definitely older than she is. The other, Greg Berg, tells me that there is a lot of misinformation that goes around in the entertainment industry about certain actors' ages and bios, and it's not even from the actors themselves.