Sir Michael Caine Success

Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :shock: :? 8) :lol: :P :oops: :cry: :roll: ;-) :| {up} {??} {down} :mrgreen: [us] [ca] [uk] [germany] {star} <<arrow$ [ugotmail]
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 256 KiB.

Expand view Topic review: Sir Michael Caine Success

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by marksautographs » Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:23 pm

mantas wrote:for comparison, here is my success from january this year. This looks like very similar for me. :roll:

http://s7.directupload.net/file/d/3151/j9iqf2ig_jpg.htm

and here are versions of his sec. and In Person....

http://www.isitreal.com/index.php?optio ... d=99999999

One of the pictures "in Person" there is very identic with the signatur on my success. thats a fact. {up}
His secs and authentics look very similar!

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by mantas » Sat Nov 09, 2013 3:44 pm

for comparison, here is my success from january this year. This looks like very similar for me. :roll:

http://s7.directupload.net/file/d/3151/j9iqf2ig_jpg.htm

and here are versions of his sec. and In Person....

http://www.isitreal.com/index.php?optio ... d=99999999

One of the pictures "in Person" there is very identic with the signatur on my success. thats a fact. {up}

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by stillluckyas13canbe » Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:15 pm

Sometimes I wonder about intelligence levels on this forum...

If you're going to claim non authentic, then back it up. We all know the debate on Caine's signature, but if you have an IDENTICAL signature to this one, then post an image of it. It's impossible to argue that a completely identical signature can be genuine, so how about you post it?

[insert meerkat trademark here]

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by parlamentetfanErik » Sat Nov 09, 2013 1:27 pm

DiamondDave wrote:
parlamentetfanErik wrote::roll:
Pretty standard response....
For a self righteous troll.
wow.....the people on this site , just can't handel the truth :roll: go a head and live in your la la world were everything you'll get in TTM is real, I'm sure that you enjoy your John Travolta, Johnny Depp, Dick Van Dyke, Al Pacino, Morgan Freeman, Colin Firth and Matthew Broderick autographs :lol: :lol: :lol: No one will stop you, go on and pretend ;-)

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by DiamondDave » Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:18 pm

parlamentetfanErik wrote::roll:
Pretty standard response....
For a self righteous troll.

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by lauloveshp » Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:25 am

Yes or maybe these are just authentic!?? I dont know why people here always have to know everything and always think first that autographs are not real unless theres a proof. Know what? Nobody can know this for sure (just like cameron diaz or channing tatums sig) and i prefer the positive way and think mine is authentic before someone can proof it, that its not (sorry for my englisch, hope its clear)

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by LuckDragon » Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:15 am

lauloveshp wrote:This is my success esrlier this year:
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic.php?t=295553
This signature is obviously slightly different from the success of the poster, so I would say maybe Sir Caine is using a sec?
I really hope someone can clear this up! I really want to have his autograph, but I don't want to end up having a sec and not knowing it. :(

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by DiamondDave » Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:30 am

Zaj wrote:
trevor1066 wrote:they are either stamps or autopen
There's no pressure points on the signature and the texture to the signature don't indicate stamp. Stop trolling.
+1

The self righteous trolls on this site definitely take away from the enjoyment of sharing the hobby here.

Re: Sir Michael Caine Success

by Zaj » Sat Nov 09, 2013 12:38 am

trevor1066 wrote:they are either stamps or autopen
There's no pressure points on the signature and the texture to the signature don't indicate stamp. Stop trolling.

Top